Friday, June 27, 2008
dressing for success
it's one of the few places in the world where diversity truly exists.
for instance, when i go to the gym, i marvel at all the different types of people i see -- brown-skinned, yellow-skinned, white-skinned, black-skinned, red-skinned. people just do their own thing, completely absorbed in their own thoughts and unaware of the fact that they are doing something fantastic and inspirational:
they are living out multiculturalism in its truest and best form -- accepting difference without even realizing it.
i think it's really cool.
my town has a respectable indian-american population (as well as vietnamese-american, russo-american, etc., populations -- didn't i say my city was great? :) ). whenever i see a woman wearing a sari out and around town, i think about one of my undergraduate english professors. she was not one of the most spectacular lecturers i've ever heard, but i loved her and was quite fond of her. she was considered to be one of the "tougher" graders in that particular department -- although i never found that to be particularly true. but of course, that's because i actually did all the reading and writing that was required. seriously, that's all it takes in order to get a good grade.
:-T
the professor was an indian-american woman who had immigrated to the united states to attend college, then to get her ph.d., in english lit. she had arrived into the country along with her loving husband, and they both ended up teaching at the small college where i ultimately met them.
my professor had hair that was long and beautiful. i would say that her hair was long enough that it reached the back of her knees, and it would swish gently as she walked. she always wore a sari to class, and they were very beautiful garments. because winters were often harsh and icy there, she often wore her saris coupled with sturdy snow boots, a sight that i often found humorous yet cute and endearing whenever i saw it.
anyhow, since my undergraduate college is located in the beehive state, you can imagine how many opportunities the people over there have to see diversity, let alone women in saris. as you can imagine -- not very many. unless you took a class from this particular professor. :-T
during my time there (not very long -- two years; as an over-achieving azngrrl, i finished college in three years, the first year having been spent at a california community college :-T), i heard every now and then inklings and rumblings from students about her attire and appearance. and i think they were harder on her, as a "tough grader," because she was such an easy target. her appearance marked her off as different, and so her teaching style was viewed as "different" as well, albeit not in the kindlinest sense of the word.
but i enjoyed having her as a professor very much. she spoke with an indian accent that was soft and lilting, and i always found her voice pleasant even when she led class discussions about dark topics, such as the imagery in or authorial intent behind sylvia plath's poem "daddy" or t.s. eliot's "the lovesong of j. alfred prufrock." seriously, it's been years since i sat in on that one class i took from her, but i still remember those lectures quite vividly.
but like i said, it is not so much her teaching style that i remember most, because her teaching style was just rather . . . average.
rather, she was an inspiring figure mostly because of her sari.
i had a meeting with her once about a paper i wanted to write for her class. we were discussing possible theses that i could explore, and somehow, the conversation veered towards the issue of diversity -- since, obviously, we were ethnic minorities at that particular school. i think that was still only my first year living in that state, and so i think i expressed to her some frustration because of how i felt i was perceived and treated because of my ethnicity and how powerless i felt in the face of it.
it's the beehive state. not only that, but it's one of the more conservative, smaller towns in that state. if you aren't white and aren't mo', or if you're not among the working class hispanic population of the town, then it sucks to live there. and no, i'm not talking about the capitol city, which is actually a cool place to live. it is another town -- o-town.
in response to my complaints, the professor told me a story about herself and about her sari.
she once gave a presentation. i can't remember what she said the topic was, but i'm sure it had to do with her specialty -- post-modernism and post-colonialism. anyhow, for the event, she wore a sari, as she usually does. and after her presentation, someone came up to her and asked her why she wore a sari. "this is america," the person said. "shouldn't you try to look more american?"
and the professor told me that, in response, she drew herself up and said, "no. i am an american, and i will wear what i want. and i like to wear my saris."
i can totally imagine her saying it like that. she was a very soft-spoken and dignified lady. i think she was actually in her sixties at the time i took her class, although she looked to be in her late forties or early fifties, at most. she never raised her voice, did not use strong language, but she could get her point across when she wanted to.
she passed away a few years ago, during my first year of law school. she was the first person in my life whom i knew to pass away. i was affected by it. i only happened to find out about her death by pure happenstance, when i was up late one night browsing through the local news (this was way before my days as a google feedreader). it was still my first semester as a 1L, and you can imagine how stressed out that first semester was for me. :-T but i remember that i was shocked and filled with grief. she was too gentle, too loving, too kind to die. . . . and i had never, ever really told her how much she had helped me and impacted me.
that very night, i drove the forty miles to the undergraduate college. to this day, i don't know why. but i did, and i snuck into the humanities/social science building. i climbed up the dark stairs to the third floor and flipped on the lights in the hallway outside the door of her office. i saw that people had already begun to pay their respects by leaving notes, cards, and gifts at the door that she would never pass through again. i read a few of them and felt emotions rising in me. then i went and found a scrap of paper and pencil and began writing a poem in free verse for her.
i'm no poet, really, and i don't remember what i wrote. i just remember the image that came in my head as i wrote it: the professor sitting cross-legged on top of a hill with her long hair winding neatly down over one shoulder. her posture was very much like buddha sitting contemplatively and quiet under a tree after finally attaining enlightenment. when i finished the poem, i taped it onto her door along with the other notes and cards that had been affixed onto it.
i did not have much of a very personal relationship with her -- not as personal as a few other english professors i had there with whom i still have pretty good friendships. but i think about her often these days, every time i drive around town or am out and about and happen to see a woman wearing a sari.
isn't that what the american dream is all about?
the american dream isn't solely about selfishness -- that is, it's not just about working hard to achieve a particular materialistic or socio-economic goal. it's about more than that. a part of it, at least at this point in history, is all about achieving complete multi-cultural diversity. not to the point where everyone who comes here ends up looking exactly like each other -- but rather to the point where everyone can remain as different as can be while still living the american dream.
Thursday, June 26, 2008
ill-fitting
the past couple of mornings, as soon as i stepped out of the house at about 7 AM, i would be struck by the faint smell of smoke. the fires closest to the capitol city of the golden state are probably a good fifty or sixty miles away in fairfield. nonetheless, it might as well be only a few miles away. it's astounding to think about, really -- the fact that so many fires, albeit a distance away, can have an affect over here where i live. the prediction is that the fires will never be completely put out throughout the summer. there will remain lingering fires, and the best the firefighters can do is just try to contain them as best as possible until the weather changes.
the effect that the smoky haze has had on the weather has been really crazy, though. i'm sure that without this smoky crap in the air, the weather would be blazingly hot. but the temperatures have gotten a bit more subdued. in the evenings, the sky is grey and overcast, but the air feels quite humid -- warm and wet. the suppressive atmosphere caused by all the smog makes me feel like i'm in l.a. it's crazy.
i went running outdoors last night, my first attempt at running since the race this past saturday. the first mile ended up making my chest feel raw because of the air. but thereafter, i was fine once i got into the swing of things.
next week here at work, i officially move downstairs to the first floor to a cube. i'll be near my new b.f.f., the vietgirl. which is cool -- i like her.
i'm amused -- and also bemused -- by her. my breaks go by so fast because we just keep chit-chatting and having laughs. but seriously, it's rare for me to come to be friends with someone so fast! for some reason, we just hit it off. and somehow we keep making lots of plans to do stuff together.
the bemusement stems from some of the odd presumptuous statements she makes. like, she has now determined that i am to cut off all coffee and soda from my diet.
uhhhh . . . .WHAT?!
who are you, and when did you become abbagirl's dietary overlord?
o_O
she drinks only water.
well, good for you. but you can leave me to my own devices, t.y.v.m.
:-T
i am just so shitty in the morning without my coffee. like, i've had to talk on the phone twice in the past twenty minutes -- and each time, i was slurring my words and stuttering incoherently. it's because my caffeine hasn't kicked in! i think i happened to make a weak-assed pot this morning.
:-P
and then when afternoon hits, i need to do the dew. otherwise, i can't get through the remainder of the day intact. like, i prolly could if i had more things to keep my mind occupied. but this week has been really rough and rather slow. like, seriously, i've had to suppress the urge to start pounding my own face with my fists! but if i had to do without my caffeine/sugar in the afternoon, i think i'd be much more worse off.
so when vietgirl said that it was her goal to wean me of caffeine and sugar, i just gave her a "psh! over my dead body!" look. for a young 'un, she was surprisingly unfazed by the look that came over my face.
"no way in hell," i told her firmly, giving her an evil eye.
"whatever," she said giving me a stern look in return, "it's gonna happen."
O_o
we'll see about that!!
anyhow, i'll be spending prolly tomorrow and monday making my transition downstairs to my new spot. i'm pretty downhearted about my new cube. no privacy whatsoever. no door to close when i need time alone. not as many chances to study from outlines. no ability to blog freely and surf the 'net when i'm bored.
*sigh*
but i don't have very many things to move. lemme see . . . . *looking around at rather bare office* maybe a small cubby of writing utensils and post-it notes, my hand sanitizer, my junk-food drawer with all of its unhealthy yumminess, a couple of plants (a money tree and a pot of violets -- why o why have my violets not yet bloomed??), hand sanitizer and lotion, and a couple of figurine thingies that add color and character to my otherwise bland work-space.
and i just realized, after having gone to the bathroom, that these pants that i'm wearing look really terrible on me! OMG! i'm embarrassed enough to want to go home and change -- but i can't!!
they just fit terribly. and make me look terrible.
don't ask, and i won't tell. i'm not giving any specifics. but they just look really terrible on me.
O_O
suffice to say . . . although i generally do feel bulgy . . . suffice to say these pants really exacerbate the feeling.
:(
Tuesday, June 24, 2008
two "f"s: on a new friend and on failing
every now and then, i've often wondered how i would've turn out had i not become such a square goody-two-shoes and had not done everything that i was supposed to do.
well, i think i know now.
as of last week, i gained a new b.f.f.: a vietgirl who works on the first floor.
she is the opposite of me in so many ways.
for instance, she's shorter than me and makes me feel gawkishly tall whenever i stand next to her. i have to suppress the urge to hunch my shoulders down and crouch at her level.
she's also a bit more out-going than me, does not have a college degree, has at least two or three tattoos, and has piercings galore. her make-up has bold colors while i tend to use more-neutral colors. she speaks vietnamese a little bit better than me, has a boyfriend, and she is actually quite interested in staying long-term at this office. she could easily promote to the next level, but she's just biding her time until the right situation comes about. in the meantime, she's quite content to remain as she is.
see? totally my opposite!
and yet we have enough commonalities to have allowed us to become friends rather quickly. but i see in her how i would've turned out if i had not played by the rules so much -- and i'm actually kind of envious. i wish i had become a bit more like her, outgoing and expressive, and less like me, introspective and rather solitary. but despite some of our contrary character traits, we're still rather alike, which is how i'm able to see myself in her and how we've come to be such fast friends.
i kinda was wary about getting to be friends with her, at least so quickly off the bat. but that's just how i am with most everyone, really. but the friendship came about because she started trying to find excuses to hang out with me in my office, and she would engage in this kind of weird, funny hinting behavior to get me to ask her if she wanted to have lunch together or whatever.
the first time she did her hints, i was reluctant about giving the green light towards anything that could lead to b.f.f. status. but ultimately i couldn't see any way around it, it was so obvious. so after she pointedly dropped a gazillion hints, i finally gave a reluctant sigh and said, "wanna go to lunch?" and then she said, "i thought you'd never ask!"
:-T
funny thing is that, once we started hanging out in my office during breaks and stuff, i soon found out that she actually went to high school with my little sister. in fact, they were in the same class for a while. trippy! but really, what i've discovered is that most of the azn-americans i meet here in the capitol city of the golden state are connected to each other within two or three degrees of separation.
it's just a fact. i don't even try to fight it.
:-T
but yeah, despite my initial reluctance to make friends (i'm just soo anti-people and everything), she's a cool chick. and we're already making a bunch of plans to hang out and do things together (but no, nothing like that -- she's straight and has a boyfriend).
i've just never had such a young friend, though. like, she's 23 and i'm about to turn 28 -- and i guess five years is not such a huge age span. but seriously, i'm used to having friends who are roughly my age or older! i'm not used to being around such a young 'un!
okay, so now i feel really old, especially for having such thoughts.
O_O
;)
bar exam repeaters
i've realized why bar exam repeaters tend to -- well, repeatedly fail.
first: the amount of time between the day results are released and the deadline to register to re-take is only two weeks.
so by the time a disheartened bar exam repeater such as me decides to re-take it yet again, which may take just about the entire two weeks to make that decision in and of itself, everyone else will have already have gotten about a month's head-start on studying and shit. and it just makes me feel like i have to play catch-up and that everyone else is ahead of the game.
sure, it's only the last month or so that really matters -- plus, i should actually be familiar with everything and just be able to hone in on the areas that i know i need to improve. but nonetheless . . . i still feel like i took off from the starting line rather late.
:-P
second: the psychological factor screws you over.
when you're a repeater, by the time you've failed, oh, about twice, you have no shred of self-esteem left. and it's just all that much more harder to believe you'll ever pass.
third: you realize that you can still succeed without being a "real attorney."
i'm at a point where i can actually get to choose a career that i want for myself -- either as an academic or doing this current job of mine, which has really opened my eyes to the kind of high-level government stuff that i can end up doing in just a few years' time.
if i keep seeking promotions (like, if i were actually that kind of motivated go-get-'em kind of person, that is), i think i could do really well.
that's why a part of me says "fuck this shit!" like, to have a successful career, i really don't have to be a practicing attorney at all. it's one thing to say this and another thing to believe it. i'm actually starting to believe it more and more.
fourth: you resignedly come to the conclusion that working and earning money, even at a non-attorney job, is much better than not working and not getting paid to take this exam.
really. after a while, it does come to be all about the money.
but i could do well at my current office. if i just stuck with it and sought promotions as soon as the opportunities were made available to me, i think i could end up pulling down an $ 80k/year salary in no time -- and without having to work crazy hours, either.
like, seriously, that'd be more than enough dough for me, a single bitchy chick who plans to remain a single bitchy chick for ever and ever more. and raise lots of bitchy bitchy chihuahuas to keep her company and bite other people for her.
grrrr.
and really, taking and re-taking and re-taking the bar exam is just costly as hell. like, i could've bought a new car already from the amount of money i've spent taking it and signing up for review courses and materials and such.
and if you only knew!! i sure could use a new car at this point . . . . my dinosaur of a car has been in the midst of dying a slow, painful death, and i do think it's on its very last legs at this point . . . .
:-T
Monday, June 23, 2008
frazzled monday
what a monday morning it's been already. my nerves are already tense, and i'm ready to go postal.
:-T
things that made the morning already go awry:
1. i spilt coffee on myself.
i seem to be quite good at that. i hadn't even pulled out of the driveway yet.
2. someone stole my gas pump.
a jerk cut in front of me and took my spot.
3. i got stuck at the gas pump.
at the gas station i went to, there are three rows of three pumps. i used a pump that was in the inside middle. just when i finished and was climbing into my car, i ended up getting trapped between two cars, both of which pulled in at roughly the same time -- one in front and one in back. they both moved in to be bumper-to-bumper with me. there was absolutely no space for me to move or get out.
i was livid. luckily, the guy who had pulled up in front of me so that his bumper was practically kissing my bumper was only buying two dollars worth of gas or something, because he got done pretty fast and started pulling out.
jerk ass.
4. after i left the gas station, i almost got into a car accident.
the gas station i went to is not in an ideal setting. it's very hard to pull into traffic in the direction that i wanted to go in. i got impatient by how long i had to wait to be able to pull into traffic and so i just kinda floored it to get out into traffic.
i doubt that i impeded traffic by all that much. but i was still honked at.
:-T
5. i almost got into a second accident when a van tried to cut me off and get into my lane.
i was in the far right lane of a three-lane road, and he was in the middle lane. bastard didn't even check to see if i was there! he came into my lane without even using a turn signal. i had to slam on the brakes. he saw me at the last minute and then jetted back into his own lane. i sped up so that i could go alongside him, and then i flipped him off and glared at him.
a few seconds later, he sped up until he was parallel with me, then he rolled down his passenger window and called out, "i'm sorry!" i scowled at him and tapped the gas pedal harder so that i could leave him in the dust once more.
6. someone took my parking spot.
i pulled into the parking lot of my office a little later than usual -- and saw a red truck sitting in my usual parking spot.
i tend to park under a plum tree in the first row closest to the office building. it's in the corner of the lot and it offers a nice shade for the afternoons.
bastard!
eh. so i parked right next to it. i guess i don't lose that much shade by parking one spot over from where i usually park. but still! that's my spot!
*sigh*
sheesh. what a morning already.
o_O
Friday, June 20, 2008
Thursday, June 19, 2008
a few reasons why abbagirl's looking forward to her birthday
expenses for month of june alone
$ 648 -- bar exam cost + laptop fee
$ 200 -- bar exam study materials
$ 500 -- rent
$ 500 -- student loan repayment
$ 500 -- other bills (approx.)
$ 120 -- slot machines and dinner at local casino
$ 60 -- registration for two 10k races
$ 180 -- new 30-gb zune to replace the one i accidentally dropped in pool
$ 100 -- gasoline (approx.)
---------
$ 2,808
O_O
!!!!
no, i didn't even factor in the cost of groceries or other small necessities, either.
no wonder i was already poor as of last week. . . .
>:-|
:-T
2. start new assignment with another boss
my new boss is a toweringly tall man. he cuts an imposing figure. i haven't formed any impressions of him yet. i'd seen him around, in and out of the executive office; i know he's got a fairly important position. i met him yesterday during a brief, introductory meeting, and he gave me a short summary of the stuff we'll be working on together. he says we're not going to have a typical boss-employee relationship; we're going to be a team.
thanks to the meeting, i do now understand what i've been hired to do. all this stuff i've been doing so far have been kind of in-between duties until it was time to start working for him. once i get underway working for this new boss, i'll be dealing with high level stuff and sensitive materials. and it's just going to be really busy and fast-paced, as i understand it. i think i'm kinda being set up to replace the guy i'll be working for. the scope of his work has a far reach, but he's the only one at the office with the unique kind of knowledge and insight over a broad number of important things. so i'll be trained to be his second, his right-hand person.
what does this mean?
well, among other things, it means i might end up having even less time and energy to study for the damned bar.
*worried, furrowed brow*
and it also means that i think they're breeding me to remain here on a long-term basis so that i can ultimate take over my soon-to-be boss' areas of expertise.
:-T
3. fireworks
who doesn't enjoy having fireworks during/around the time of one's birthday?
:)
Wednesday, June 18, 2008
words
do words matter?
well, maybe that's not the right way to frame the question. obviously, words do matter. they are our primary form of communication, whether written or oral. they are the primary means through which we make known our current state of mind, state of our bodies, our wishes, and desires. we use them to solidify bonds and relationships with other people. so i guess my question is a dumb one; of course, words matter.
so i'll just re-phrase the question:
do we say what we mean anymore?
(assuming we ever did, to begin with?)
call me naive, but i always tend to think that most people are just like me: they say exactly what they mean. my instinctive tendency is that any word i say (or write) on a matter of seriousness should have the force of belief or conviction behind it. i'm not going to waste my breath, when i have something on my mind, on saying things i don't really intend to have meaning. i want to be able to say things with the precise meaning i intend for them to have, and up until now, i've always had the likely naive belief that at such moments of seriousness, the other person i'm taking to has that same intent.
of course, this rule doesn't apply to situations like polite conversation. like, if someone i barely know asks me, "how are you?" by way of greeting, of course, i'll say, "fine, thanks! how are you?" even if i'm not feeling particularly fine and dandy that day. and obviously, it doesn't apply to situations in which you're obviously joking around or having fun. the situations i'm thinking of when i take for granted that honesty counts are those in which i have established at least fairly personal relationships and in which i've come to expect at least a basic level of intimate confidence and honesty.
but this is just not the standard that the people i let into my confidence adhere to. and it is so much a disappointment for me whenever i end up finally coming to that realization that, while i may have meant every word i said at a particular point in time, the other person may not have.
it gets me. it really does. i'm jaded enough to know better. and yet i still end up falling into that same trap over and over of believing when i ought not to have. it is probably always my fault that i end up believing. i really ought to know better; i tend to trust so few people as it is . . . . but those instances when i do place my trust in people, i sometimes end up getting burned so badly that it takes me a while to even want to play that game again.
this especially tends to happen with people who otherwise like to think of themselves as candid and honest. candid and honest my ass. but what can you do, especially if you're as nice a person as me? you can't do anything. you let them continue deluding themselves and let them believe what they will about themselves, but you yourself now have reason not to take them at their word anymore. you play their game, if you still want or have to play it, and nod your head in time with them as if you agree and believe them, but secretly, take every word they say with a grain of salt.
is this how the game of life is supposed to be played?
i just find it funny. i am a major relativist. i recognize that my beliefs, my ideas, and my standards, while they feel quite right to me, are not the ultimate gauge for judging things. it's just me. anyone else can have different standards, beliefs, and ideas, but they are just different and neither better nor worse than mine.
there are others who are a little less lenient than me in how they perceive others. they tend to have strict religious or politicial or personal beliefs by which they judge the world and are quite inflexible. they prioritize their beliefs as "Ultimate Right" and look down on others who don't share those beliefs.
i don't ever want to be one of such people.
now, what bugs me about some of those people who adhere to the christian faith and take the bible as "the word of god" should, of all people, understand the importance of words. i don't know very much about christianity or the bible, but i do understand that the text is taken to be the "gospel of truth." it contains stories, whether allegorical or historially real, and is considered to be the word of god.
call me weird -- but just that phrase "word of god" implicitly carries with it a significant weight on the connotation of the word "word." if humans are really the creation of god, and words were used by god and put into textual form as a guide to humans for living and conducting themselves, then it stands to reason -- at least in my twisted mind -- that humans should use words as purposefully and justly in the same way god did in an attempt to mirror him/her/it and pay homage. using words to prevaricate, lie, mislead, or otherwise not show one's true intentions is as far away from god as you can get.
in short, in the view of creationism, god created humans and also provided us with the ability to use words. god him-/her-/itself used words to show humans how to live and how to reach heaven in the afterlife. thus, humans should use words, the gift of god, in the beneficial, direct way that god did and intended them to do.
right?
or, um, am i off-base in my reasoning?
i wouldn't be surprised if i were.
but in the meantime, i'm learning slowly but surely that i can't take other people at their word per se.
i do stand alone, in more ways than one. and i'll continue to stand alone in making sure no one ever is unclear about my views, my thoughts, my ideas. like, of course, i'll continue to play the game of politeness ("how are you, abbagirl?" "i'm fine, thanks -- how are you?"). but in all other circumstances, especially at times when honesty counts for something and others are counting on me to be honest, i won't be anything less.
i'll still hold myself accountable to being honest even though i can't count on others to necessarily do likewise.
Tuesday, June 17, 2008
r.i.p. cyd charisse
brigadoon. the bandwagon. the long, sultry dance sequence in singin' in the rain. ziegfeld follies. these were among the best musicals produced by MGM during the hey-day of big musical extravaganzas on the big screen.
she was a dark-haired dancer with an exotic beauty and amazing long legs. she moved with seductive grace in films that showcased her dancing talents, holding her own with the likes of gene kelly and fred astaire.
an amazing, talented woman. and did i mention she had amazing legs?
i went through a stage where i was in love with MGM musicals. for me, that was entertainment!
cyd charisse made three-lettered first names cool. she epitomized sleek grace and an untouchable etherealness. i had a funky three-lettered first name, too, but i wanted her name -- as if by having her name, all her fantastic qualities could be imbued into me.
but i can only keep dreaming.
in the meantime, there will ever be only one cyd.
running the endless race
and obviously, the start of summer for me won't be june 21st, the otherwise official start of the season -- but august 1st.
i'm actually way too winded and psychologically depleted to care about the bar exam this time around. i really ought to care more because i just forked over another damned $ 650 to pay for the exam. but i can't help it; i've reached the stage of utter disregard for it.
i can't help but compare my attitude towards the bar to my attitude towards running. with running, i've learned to dedicate myself and to push myself. there are always finite goals to achieve: improve my cardio, improve my time, improve my speed, improve my endurance. in my mind, i've identified all the things, big and small, that i need to do in order to continue to improve. what's funny is that i never used to like running as much as i do now; i used to hate it! but having set goals and having fun in achieving them, i've learned to take something i really hate and turn it into something that i now look forward to every day and that really ends up making me feel great. like, running in the evening, when the day has cooled down and there's a soft cool breeze to soothe the sweat -- it really is a great way to cap off the day.
but the bar?
i have no markers to indicate how i progress -- at least not for the essays. for the MBEs, at least you can see how your score jumps up or junps down as you practice. no grader can screw you on your score. but the essays . . . . they make me feel aimless. they take away my drive.
i really don't know what to say about them. i worked really hard to improve them. like in july 2007's bar exam, my essays were all over the board. they weren't as organized as the ones i did for february 2008. as a result, those scores were all over the board -- they fell into a broad range. for february, i cut out a lot of the bullshit -- and learned to completely restructure my writing. and i ended up getting low scores with a very narrow score range.
like i mentioned before, all my day 1 essays scored the same, and all my day 2 essays scored the same as well. this tells me that for february 2008, i made the same mistakes in all the essays (or that the grader didn't even fucking read my essays at all), and these mistakes were actually kinda bigger than the mistakes that i made for the july 2007 essays. cumulatively, i scored lower this past february than i did last july.
this tells me i did worse this time around. or that the graders really are more generous when it comes to the july exams.
but i just don't know. it just does NOT make any sense to me. and not knowing what exactly it is that keeps me from jumping over the hurdle is just so frustrating. like, how can i improve if i don't know?
but that's just the point, isn't it? maybe i'm not supposed to improve. maybe i'm not supposed to be a member of this state's bar. after all, i graduated from an out-of-state law school.
you know, in studying for the february 2008 bar, i was more frustrated than anything. like, the whole process, the scoring, everything about the bar exam just made me feel rather angry and frustrated.
for this july one, as i go through the ropes, i'm still frustrated, but . . . i kinda give up, too. i literally do not know what to do. like, i'm re-reading yet again all my outlines to stimulate my memory of the black letter law -- but every few minutes, i'm still shaking my head because i've read this shit so many damned times. it drives me nuts how many times i've read, and re-read, and re-read this crap in the past year alone. only a multiple failure, someone who's been in my shoes, can understand how frustated just sitting alone with one's outlines is. no other feeling can compare.
but i'm done with it after this. forget this shit. fuck the bar. fuck the graders. i've gone through the rat race just like everyone else, and i've been through the wringer, i've spent so much goddamned money on this and lost out on a lot of potential income, and obviously, there's just something missing on my part. so this is truly it for me. i really don't want to be playing this game anymore.
done.
Monday, June 16, 2008
in/out
i have been for the past 30 minutes.
my goodness. what an onslaught. it was unexpected.
i just got outed at work.
it kinda bothers me, yes. like i mentioned in another post before, who i am personally does not have any room in the workplace. this is just a place where i clock in and clock out. people better not ask me "what i am" any more than they should ask me whether i'm gay or straight. like, none of your business. and i just don't like being talked about -- and it's become clear to me that i have been talked about, or at least speculated about, which does make me uncomfortable.
so what gave me away? what "outed" me?
not my clothes, not my hair. not my make-up, not my mannerisms. i guess it is not a single aspect of me that gives me away. make no mistake -- i can pass, and obviously i am quite successful about it. but i guess there is something a bit "off" about me that even i didn't know.
and apparently, the culprit is my watch.
i guess i shouldn't be too bothered; after all, the two people who speculated about whether i'm gay or not are at least half-gay themselves. like the gay guy who outed me said, "you're one of us."
so there's an "us" and "them," is there?
:-T
what i guess i should take amusement from is the fact that the question of which way i bend inspired real discussion between them. like, they just couldn't tell for sure either way.
one of them is a bi woman. she's been annoying the hell out of me. like, she decided some time ago that she and i were going to be b.f.f., but there is no one in the building more annoying than she. she is a large woman, and she tends to talk non-stop. just when you think she's stopping to pause for breath and will stop talking, she starts a new inundation of words. but she's the one who decided i was "one of them" because of the watch i wear.
the other one, a middle-aged gay guy, wasn't too sure about me, he said. he thought i could go either way. he told me all this just now.
but yeah, that's why i'm flustered -- because he kinda came out and outed me without asking me outright, per se. and i'm like SHEESH. can't i have some privacy?
:-T
it's just weird. i've never been outed at work before. i've always maintained that line between private and professional. i'm not used to this, so it's kinda made me do a double-take.
the simple rule of thumb, at least for me, has always been m.y.o.b. i'll respect your space, you respect mine. you take me at face value, i'll take you at face value unless you give me reason to do otherwise. equal dignity, equal respect. period.
*sigh*
still, i want to know how in the frickin' world is my watch so totally gay and such a big give-away? granted, my watch has a wide leather band -- and it's black -- but is it gay? i welcome feedback. i feel i should also add that when i bought the watch last year, i actually wanted to get it in red -- but when i got to the store, all they had left was black.
so there. i actually wanted it in red. would it have made a difference if it were red?
*sigh*
i liked it better when i was more ambiguous.
thanks a lot, gay dude. you've succeeded in jolting me out of the rest of my day.
poopersnap.
:-T
seriously. don't they have anything better to do than speculate as to whether i'm "one of them" or not?
"one of them," my butt.
as if!
sorry. but i stand alone.
the never-ending saga of mundanity that is abbagirl's life
that decision got put off the burner for a while, as i tried to get myself situated at the office with this new job and as i struggle to put together some semblance of a steady study schedule. nonetheless, it still remained very much in my thoughts, and i'd perpetually been trying my best to weigh the pros and cons of it all these past few months.
there were so many factors to consider. now, though, i am happy to say that a decision has been made.
but i won't say what it is.
yet.
:-T
instead, over time, i think it will eventually become obvious at some point what my decision is as i continue to blog about all my goings-on and stuff. but yes, it really was a difficult decision to make. . . . i put off making the decision for as long as possible because i really couldn't make up my mind. depending on how i was feeling on a particular day, i would end up preferring one option over the other -- but my preference would not remain absolute for long. even now, i'm damned if i know whether the route i've chosen to take is the one that is the "best" for me. . . .
but suffice to say, in the end, i think all the major choices we make have the potential to be the "best" ones, so long as we make 'em so. as a result, i know i can only win regardless of the choices i make. what's important to remember is that even when making a major decision, regardless of how major it seems, the story doesn't end there. there are still many more options to be created, many more roads that will pop up on the horizon as you continue on your journey. so even if one possibility seems to be closed off to you as a result of a decision you make, you still have the power to create more opportunities for yourself, and your story will always continue on and introduce you to more and more adventures.
so stay tuned. the saga of abbagirl has only just begun.
:-T
speaking of sagas . . . .
trying to get into a regular studying schedule for the bar has been a saga in and of itself. . . .
:-P
things come up to distract me from studying -- or i'm too tired to concentrate -- or i'd much rather waste my time doing something else -- or i'm too bored. . . .
but the whip needs to come down, and it needs to come down hard. abbagirl is just getting too lazy for her own good.
:-P
if i study productively and intensively enough, then i can pass -- i know it. i'm remembering a post i put up, right after the last bar exam was over, in which i wrote about how doable i felt the bar exam to be. like the questions weren't that hard. and my issue-spotting isn't the problem, either. it's the darned presentation of the issues in the essays.
but geez louise, i don't know how much more clearer i can be in framing my essay. i used outlines provided by my then-bar review course, each of which provided standardized paragraphs for how you should write your essay for any potential issues that arise. and i studied those fuckers -- i memorized almost verbotem the clear and concise paragraphs.
now . . . i'm not sure whether those outlines, which my bar review course touted as the sure-fire study aid to help one pass, does any good. because those sample essays that got the high scores in the 70- to 75-point range from the bar essays website seem to be just mostly like, well, regular essays. like, they're hella long and wordy, the type of essays that i thought i was told in my bar review lectures might be swell as a law review article but would not get me points on the bar exam. instead, they said, avoid all temptation to write those overly pedantic essays and just make sure your essays are clear and that your key terms are bolded and CAPPED.
it's true that it was hard to pay attention in bar review class, and my attention often wandered. but i could've sworn that this is what we were told.
so. like, dude. WTF!
O_O
in the meantime, ugh! it's monday -- so hopefully, it'll be a slow day, and i can try to sneak peaks at my outlines every now and then.
my appetite is whacked out. i've got a race coming up this weekend (the one providing the free pancakes afterward). my running is petering off and is not as consistent anymore, but i hope to do all right with this race; it's only ("only") 4 miles. because i haven't been consistent with my running these past two weeks, my body has no idea what's going on. my metabolism is high and i'm always hungry -- and yet my body doesn't burn up the food very fast, so everything i eat tends to sit at my middle.
my pervy personal trainer has been pestering me to set up my next appointment with him, but i haven't because, well, he's pervy, and also because i don't want him to measure my body fat and see that i haven't been adhering to my nutritional schedule. i'm going to put him off for another week and try to get back on the diet and maybe also try to schedule a personal training session at the other gym that's also located near my house.
yeah, i'd really rather go to another gym than see the pervy personal trainer again. like, it'd be a wholly different matter if it were a pervy but cute chick in form-fitting work-out attire as my personal trainer; like, she could feel me up all she wanted. but instead, it's some shrimpy, half-century old, pervy dude with a barrel chest and a sneaky look about his face.
maybe it's just me . . . he is a nice guy.
but he just weirds me out.
:-T
Thursday, June 12, 2008
the saving grace of wontons
but that post is gone, and so are the emotions behind them. :)
it helped that i had lunch with a friend who happened to be near my neck of the woods, and i was able to get the wonton noodle soup i'd been craving for, like, ever. plus, he was able to catch me up on all sorts of gossip which was nice.
gossip and wontons -- a good combination.
the wontons were deliciious. tasty and delicate -- they hit the spot!
i was also tempted to order taro boba, my favorite boba drink in the world. but . . . i knew it would add an extra eight pounds to my belly.
:-T
my friend asked me what i wanted to do for my birthday. to tell the truth, i was surprised he remembered. i've known him for fifteen years, since we were in sixth grade, two gawky, nerdy azn kids at an otherwise mostly white hick elementary school. he's probably remembered my birthday once in all the time i've known him.
:-T
i didn't know how to answer his question. what do i want to do for my birthday. . . ? i hadn't really thought about it.
2-8. i'll be 28. i feel ten years older than that, to tell the truth, but am often mistaken for being about ten years younger. okay, maybe not ten years -- maybe just five to eight years younger. :-T but in just under a month, i'll have successfully lived to see 10,220 days -- 10,220 rising suns and darkening nights.
speaking of, i was just remarking to someone that i was disappointed in what i've achieved in life thus far. my main goal has always been to get my ph.d in lit., and i had always envisioned that i would finish it by the time i was thirty.
obviously, that dream has disintegrated into dust. :-T
but . . . no regrets. right? life causes plans to change, and the best thing to do is always adapt. but . . . i dunno . . . . that path that i wanted to go down but never did tends to haunt me every now and then. because i ended up going down a path that has made me confront failure after failure.
not to say that the other path is guaranteed to have been better. . . . who knows -- i could've encountered a lot of failings on that side, too.
so who knows. i think i'll always kinda wish i had chosen my path a little differently, but i can't have too many regrets because i've had a number of experiences and met a lot of people who have made lasting impressions on my life in many ways; such things would never have happened had i not taken the road that led me here to this very point.
damn it. does everyone get nostalgic like this the older they get, in the short days leading up to their next birthday?
:-T
but i know a cure for nostalgia. not wontons but . . . dim sum!
:)
Tuesday, June 10, 2008
voices
when i was a child, i was used to not having a voice at all. as a result, i rarely ever said a word. i found quiet corners -- the crevice between the piano and a bookshelf, under the window behind the sofa, the small space between a bed and the wall -- and i hid from everyone. i hid from people who terrorized me, people who cared for me, people who didn't understand me. instead, i opened books that filled my own mind with the voices conjured by creative writers and got lost in imaginary, wonderful but fictional worlds seemingly conjured just for me. i had nothing to say, and no one would have listened anyway. i was on my own. but i could see things no one else could see, imagine things no one else around me could imagine, feel emotions that no one else knew i felt. the secret worlds unveiled in my head from books -- that was my joy.
as a teenager, i began finding my voice, and i used it in aggressive ways to erect boundaries. no other voices would ever tell me what to do again -- or so i thought. i was a craggy girl with oversized wire-framed glasses and long awkward limbs. my voice was hoarse from long lack of use. i was a nobody, but i still stood defiant against the world. i wanted room to grow, to find my path, to develop my dreams. i lashed out violently against those who opposed me and whom, i felt, did not want me to go on my own path or didn't even understand what i was trying to do. in retrospect, i don't think anyone really ever did. all i knew at the time was that i finally felt like it was time for me to scream, after having been voiceless for so long. it was a painful time.
when i was nineteen, i found myself in a new state with no friends and nothing familiar to me. i went back to having no voice. i retreated back into myself and immersed myself in my studies, and in no time, those voices i had heard as a child, in my books, were resurrected. i felt i finally understood my purpose. i felt that voice inside me begin to emerge and assert itself more confidently. as a result, i finally knew what my purpose, my path, my gift was: the voice in me had found its tune and was now in harmony.
now, i still have my voice, but it does not make itself heard all the time. it comes in bits and pieces but is nonetheless never entirely, wholly there. sometimes it says only what it thinks people want to hear. sometimes it speaks from the heart, but no one will listen. sometimes it does not speak at all. however, it has not sung. it has not sung in a long time.
cacophony. other voices intrude. but these voices are not the ones in my books that saved me from darkness as a child. they are voices that still attempt to usurp mine. some are benign in their attempt, others more ruthless, more exacting. sometimes these voices attempt to shut me up altogether. other times, they reiterate the words that fumble off my tongue, but the words have been re-appropriated, twisted, even denigrated; they are no longer mine. like rumpelstilskin, they seek to conquer my voice and twist it to use it for their own ends. but i am not blind; i see what is happening. nonetheless, i still do their bidding, laboring silently, spinning my straw into gold for their enjoyment, the caged bird singing mechanically.
and so it has been.
one of the more prominent voices in my life made itself heard to me last night. and i agreed to do its bidding despite the heaviness that rose up in my chest. again -- i am doing it again -- letting someone else overtake my will and make me feel like nothing more than an empty vessel, a mindless drone, an automaton wandering aimlessly to fulfill other people's bidding
i do it because i feel i have to, i know i have to. to say no would be to cause feelings of hurt and indignation. haven't i always been there for you? haven't i always done whatever i could for you? don't you want to help?
of course. of course, i want to help.
and so it is.
some day soon, i will sing my own songs once more.
i do hope i will.
Monday, June 09, 2008
season of the witch
i'm much better now. it's these monday mornings. you know what karen carpenter sang about mondays: "rainy days and mondays always get me down . . . ." for her, maybe. but for me, i turn downright cranky.
:-T
this weekend was just pretty terrible. i was grouchy throughout.
remember how excited i was about my green strapless dress? and about being able to wear it saturday night?
uh-huh. yeah. didn't happen.
first of all, i saw, for the first time, that kelly green is not my color. let alone as a strapless dress. it was pretty bad.
second of all, a . . . disagreement occurred. and it left me feeling bad tempered enough to just want to stay home and not go.
you know, i write an awful lot about my mom. she and i have a great relationship, and although i'll mention, from time to time, the things she does that irk me, the fact that i even write about them is a sign that i know that she and i will be able to work through it. my mom and i are the bestest of buds, and she is so important to me that i can't think, talk, or write about anything without referring to her. we are usually on the same page about most things.
the person i don't write about at all is my dad. i don't have much of a relationship with him -- and what happened between us friday night is a good reminder of why. when stuff happens such as what happened then, i get angry at first -- but then my emotions just completely shut off and i end up feeling absolutely nothing at all.
not to say anything more, but you have to really push my buttons a lot in order for me to stop feeling anything about you anymore.
:-T
so now i just have a dress to return, and a new day tomorrow, as always, to look forward to. but seriously, this must be shit-on-abbagirl month.
speaking of which, i can't believe that we're already so far into the month of june. i'm turning 28 real soon. i feel like i've been 28 -- i should be at least 30 by now.
:-T
as for bar review, i'm starting to study again. it's not taking much to refresh my memory -- what i need to do is start practicing the essay-writing.
:(
i got my exam booklets in the mail over the weekend. it just makes me even more bitter.
i don't understand the low scores on my first day of exams. i looked at essays from the bar essays website, and i don't see how the scores i got on day 1 were comparable to essays that received that kind of low score on prior bar exams. maybe i just need someone else's eyes to look at my essays, but i thought my day 1 essays were a lot stronger than that.
i know i should not get caught up in what i think my scores shoud be. but seriously, i'm mad about it. how can essays that i spent the best amount of time on and felt more strongly about have scored so much less than an essay i wrote on day 2, for which i only spent 50 minutes and never finished?
it's so fucking arbitrary, it's not even funny.
i don't want to get cranky again, so i'll stop talking about and dwelling on the bar exam. i don't have much else to do today at work, so i might as well start studying. . . .
but seriously, this is quite a downer of a month. next month had better be better.
:-T
dilemma
unlike some hillary-philes, i don't intend to give my vote to the other party just because my girl didn't get the nomination.
but then mccain had to turn out to be an abba-lover.
what's a manic abbagirl to do?
:-T
token azngrrl speaketh
i feel so . . . naked without it.
:-T
last week, i was invited out to lunch with a few co-workers: a couple of p.r. people and the secretary of the big cheese. while we were eating, our small talk turned to the topic of our office's location. my co-workers expressed some regret that we were located in a rather ghetto part of town. but in a cheery manner, i said, "i like it! there's a lot of great food everywhere -- american, mexican, vietna-- uh, -mese . . . ."
my voice trailed off like that when i uttered the word "vietnamese." because i saw the growing look of interest in their eyes, the kind of interest that made me know what was going to happen:
i was to become the Grand Emissary of All Things Viet. the Ultimate Representation of Viet Folk. the Token Minority in Their Midst.
damn it. me and my big mouth.
they didn't even ask me if i was viet. i had just made it clear just from that one sentence. i suppose if i had uttered "korean" instead, i would have been presumed to be korean instead, too. 'cause all azns do look alike and all.
:-T
interestingly enough, i wasn't the only ethnic minority in the group; one of the p.r. people is hispanic american.
it's strange how some minority groups are considered more "acceptable" or "normal" than others.
anyhow, i was then asked to become Group Leader on another lunch excursion this week and to pick out a viet restaurant that they all could try. this will be their First Encounter with Viet Food. apparently, despite having worked here for a while and this part of town being ghetto central and the Viet Capitol of norcal, they have yet to try out any of the viet restaurants here at all. it's a shame. i swear, you can't throw a stone in any direction without hitting a viet restaurant.
and i can picture it now: i'll be asked "what's this?" about two thousand times and be required to break down all the ingredients for every dish on the menu so that they will be sure they're not eating anything "weird." and by the time we get done ordering, i will feel like i've run an entire marathon and be really starved to death for food. but then while eating, i have to watch them pick and sort at their food, even though there really isn't anything "foreign," "exotic," or otherwise inedible on their dish. and then i'll have to re-explain all the ingredients yet again.
ugh! obviously, i've been the Emissary for All Things Viet more than once. and i'm sorry, but i just don't have the personality for it. in my experience, it can just be the most painstaking role ever. i end up feeling very much like a parent who's on her very last nerve with a child in its terrible-twos stage. like, you just want to have fun and not take everything so seriously -- but you also don't want to keep having to hand-hold and justify everything all the time, either.
:-P
but that's not what irked me. i'm cool with eating out at any one of my fav restaurants nearby the office. what irked me was being treated like the Token Representative Azn who could speak for all other asian-americans.
good hell.
among the other things i was asked about Viethood-ness, i was asked whether it was possible for me to Know Who Other Asians Are just by virtue of names alone. the person who asked me that question then leaned forward over the table, propped her chin up on one hand, and looked at me with avid interest.
it just made me want to go, "uh, do you know a macgregor from an anderssen? a weiss from an ivanovsky? of course, you can tell which region of the world a person's family comes from!" seriously, it's no different from white people being able to distinguish irish names from russian ones.
i dunno. maybe most asian surnames do sound the same. but there are at least a couple of differences between a lee and a sung, a takeda and a nguyen.
:-T
i just don't like stupid questions. i don't like being treated like a foreigner, as if the very things i say, eat, believe are any different or exotic than anyone else.
seriously. uncomfortable. and kinda annoying in a wince-worthy kind of way.
:-T
don't get me wrong -- i really am all for the idea of getting to know other cultures and taking a risk and trying new cuisines. but i just think there are more sophisticated ways of getting that kind of education. like, you don't have to treat other people with kid gloves or make them feel self-conscious about their different-ness. and i suppose it could be worse . . . . like, instead of this concentrated but awkwardness-inducing attempt to understand, as americans, we could still be living in an age where brutality and intense racism went hand-in-hand in daily life. i suppose that, if i consider the historical context, i should be "grateful" that only social weirdness results.
:-P
in my perfect world, i can be as different as i want to be but still be treated and accepted as if i were no different -- no better, no worse -- than anyone else. like, i'm proud of how different i am from the status quo on more than one level -- but i'm also proud of the commonality i have with everyone else in this society. the only criteria for determining whether i was worth getting to know would merely whether i'm a stupid ass or not -- and of course, i would probably lose friends based on that alone. . . .
but i'd rather be friendless than constantly be regarded as the Token Azn.
:-T
speaking of Token Azns -- or rather, anything but Token Azns -- i just read a new post on racialicious about a new reality television series that will actually have azn-american lesbians featured in it.
azn-american lesbians?! is there any such thing?!
wow . . . .
:)
Thursday, June 05, 2008
in the flesh
underneath my race number bib is the letter "O." i took off my bib whenever my friends and i took group pictures. all of us wore the same navy-colored top, and each person represented a single letter. and when we all stood side-by-side, we spelled out:
"W E *heart* P O R N ! !"
then on our backs, we wrote out our porn names.
:)
and yeah, that's a nerdy little shoe wallet on my right foot in the second pic. nerdy -- but totally awesome! i got it at the local sports authority just a few days before the race. my ID, bank card, car key, and a small wad of cash fit in there just fine, and velcro straps wrapped around the laces prevent the wallet from falling off. only 7 bucks -- and seriously a great investment.
my laptop is all shitty at the moment. i can only blog from work now. the o.s. on my laptop is microsoft vista. i got it approximately one year ago -- and i've been chronically getting the blue screen of death ever since. LAME. i had taken it in for repairs just before this last bar, and i got it back just in time to be able to download examsoft and use it for the bar. it was totally fine for a while -- until a couple of weeks ago, a trojan horse virus found its way onto the system. . . . i ended up having to reboot the entire system -- but that only seems to have made things worse. . . .
so i'm thinking i'm just going to splurge and get yet another laptop and just junk this one. vista is supposed to have improved and worked out all the glitches that the earlier version had, so i'm hoping that this is the right thing to do. . . . but it makes me wince. the bar exam fee and my student loan payment are already zapping half of my paycheck from last month. . . . but maybe i can wait until next month to get a new laptop . . . .
in the meantime, i just signed up for another race in a couple of weeks. this time, it's all flat terrain, on the black-top, in a part of the capitol city that's kinda on the ghetto side. like, really ghetto. as in, you-don't-want-to-go-there-at-night ghetto. but of course, the place is pretty harmless in the light of day. :)
it's only a 5k, i believe. so i ought to be doing much better than i did with last weekend's 10k. . . .
:-T
what's even better is that the race offers free pancakes to all visitors and participants. free food! i'm totally down with that!
extra butter, please.
:)
Wednesday, June 04, 2008
a marked difference
"nuh-uh!"
"get out!"
"no way!"
that's how i talk. i'm really good, mostly, at making sure that kind of lingo doesn't stray into polite or professional conversations. but the moment i hit some kind of comfort level or if i feel the atmosphere around me breaking down from polite to relaxed, it starts coming out -- my valley girl/surfer dude lingo, with a bit of utah slang verbage thrown in.
but when i utter these kinds of phrases, it's not actually supposed to mean anything. they're a way for me to express interest and keep a conversation going. but it's just fluff -- it doesn't actually mean anything.
usually i have no problems. the people i talk to tend to have no trouble getting me.
but my co-worker, laotian girl, is a different story.
she and i have gotten into some pretty tart exchanges. nothing overly hostile, per se, but just . . . tart. for a while, i could never quite put my finger on what was causing the problems; after all, we had gotten along pretty well during my first few days on the job. like, we would start off having friendly conversations, but the more we talked, the more our level of civility would start deteriorating until either she would finally stomp off in a huff or i would just end a conversation abruptly but as politely as i could. whenever it got to that point, we wouldn't talk to each other for days.
but i realized pretty recently what the problem was: social/cultural differences.
plus, we're both rather argumentative people who don't like being one-upped.
:-T
i can talk to most people using my valley girl/surfer dude lingo, with a bit of utah slang verbage thrown in, and there really is never a problem. i do it to be kinda cute, yeah -- but i also do it to facilitate an easy-going atmosphere, and no one has ever misinterpreted my phrasology.
but to laotian girl, whenever i say something like "no way!" in response to something she says, she reads it as a confrontation -- an argument. she thinks i'm disputing her words. and then she gets all affronted -- which in turn makes me lose my cool and start getting annoyed as well. and that's when it deteriorates.
i don't want to say i'm in the right and she's in the wrong, or vice versa. no, i'm a relativist -- and i recognize that it's just a cultural/social difference. and it's not so much that it's because she's laotian and i'm viet -- but it's more that the people she interacts with tends to use a different kind of lingo and value certain kinds of communication devices than the peeps i tend to hang around with. like i've mentioned before, she's totally ghetto -- from her 'tude to her speech to her chronic head-neck movements and hand gestures. and me -- i'm just more . . . .
white.
:-T
the point when i realized that laotian girl was getting offended by my white people/valley girl/surfer dude phrasology was last week, when she came to my office brandishing a sheet of paper she'd just printed off from our department's intranet. she and i had discussed, a while before, the merits of accruing annual leave versus vacation/sick leave. vacation/sick leave allows you to accumulate a certain number of hours for both vacations and sicknesses time per full month worked. annual leave is the same, except that the hours earned are not divided into either vacation or sick leave but are just all lumped together.
on a cumulative basis, it is probably better to sign up for vacation/sick leave hours because you earn 14 total hours per month as opposed to only 11 hours per month for annual leave. nonetheless, i've opted to sign up for annual leave. first of all, i never had the option of choosing before and so i'm used to having annual leave and being able to use my hours for anything i want, regardless of whether i'm on vacation or sick. plus, i like the notion that whenever i leave state service, i'll be able to cash out on all my hours earned -- unlike with vacation/sick leave hours, with which you can only cash out on vacation time, i think, and not sick leave.
anyway, it is a very boring, technical discussion, but as state workers, laotian girl and i had had a discussion at length about it. state workers are just really kinda into that stuff.
:-T
but yah, she's got vacation/sick leave herself.
so when she came into my office brandishing the paper, about a week after we had that discussion, it turned out the paper she had in her hand was a page printed out from the memoranum of understanding for our particular job classification. the page describes the difference between annual leave and vacation/sick leave.
we ended up getting into yet another discussion about it. and i thought we were only discussing, on an objective basis, the differences between the two. i explained to her my reasons for signing up for annual leave and listened to her as she told me why she liked vacation/sick leave. i said a couple of "no way!"s during her explanation because even though i knew i got less hours per month with annual leave, i didn't realize it was actually three less hours. i thought it was more like one or two. but still, even that was not enough to convince me to change how i treat my earned time, and i thanked her for the information but said i was going to stick with what i had.
and so she got het up. she got red in the face, and her words came out more quickly and loudly. she was really taking it personally. and she didn't like me saying my "no way!"s and the fact that i wasn't changing my mind. she kept repeating over and over how vacation/sick leave was great for her, as a parent, because she could take time off when she just wanted a free day or when she had to take care of her sick daughter. and i yelled back at her, "that's great for you! thanks for letting me know!"
:-T
but really, her vehemence surprised me. it just made me want to go, "damn! chill!" i did not know why she was getting all affronted, for one thing; for another, she knows i ain't got no kids, so that "sick daughter" argument was not going to work with me. and lastly, what the fuck business of hers? something that is none of her business should not be reason for her to get all pissy and snarky.
finally, she left in a huff. right after she left the room, i realized that had been her way of "helping" me. and she didn't appreciate the fact that i did not embrace her "help" with welcoming arms.
/:-T
so we didn't speak to each other for a few days.
things are cool now. but that one exchange helped me, upon reflection, to know how to work with her. there is just a stark difference between how we interact. and i know she's trying her best to get along with me. i know she thinks i'm really weird. and i'm just trying to get along with her, too. as people in the same job classification but in an executive office, we're kinda outnumbered by all the higher-ups in this office. so we need each other as allies.
but just realizing this key piece that is dividing us is what's going to help our relations improve. i already have begun avoiding my usual casual lingo when talking with her -- and there's just a marked difference. and i think she's trying her best to avoid using a derisive tone with me. and we're doing much better at avoiding arguing over moot points.
teamwork. it's all in a day's work.
:-T
Tuesday, June 03, 2008
bees to pollen
do i miss smoking? actually . . . no. not a single bit. :) running is my new addiction. who knew that a lazy ass like me would eventually take to it, like a bee to pollen?
speaking of bees to pollen, i finally got my hands on the cute dress that caught my eye the other day.
i like it because it's a fairly simple dress -- but it fits great. jcrew always has made clothes that fit me pretty well. :) what's most satisfying is that it just felt nice to actually be able to splurge on a cute dress without having to worry about the price tag. :-T
i also found a great pair of satiny peep-toe heels to go with it, too. and it's great that the dress is just a simple solid color; it's going to be my template, and i'll try to dig through my accessories to add some pizazz to it. but seriously, it's just been so long since i had any reason to really get all dolled up -- so i just kinda wanna take advantage and go all out this weekend.
i printed out some of my old black letter law outlines today. i refuse to dig up the old ones i printed out for the last bar; i want to have fresh copies of everything. i rifled through the outlines a bit. but i have to take it slow. just re-reading all that crap about subject matter jurisdiction and federal question made me want to start snoozing.
:-T
but there's just been a lot of down-time at work lately. my boss is out in the field for most, if not all, of this week. so i figure i ought to do something productive to fill in the time.
i also went out and voted today. nothing major going on that i needed to vote for, except for a few local positions and also a couple of propositions -- props 98 and 99, both of which are centered around the government's eminent domain powers. i popped on over to a local elementary school to vote after work, at about 5:30 p.m. i was only the 80th person to come in that day to vote. it was a bit pathetic -- but a huge turn-out actually hadn't been expected.
i am proud to say that, in regards to these propositions, i voted exactly the opposite of what a guest blogger on michelle malkin's blog recommended this morning. so that has me convinced that i voted correctly. :)
speaking of michelle malkin, there's seriously something wrong with her. my mom says malkin even looks evil. i don't want to criticize a fellow riotous azngirl; crazy azngirls like us do need to stick together. but really, the hatred that emanates out of her just perplexes me sometimes .
malkin has had at least a couple of skirmishes (like, here and here) with a couple of girls at one of my favorite blogs ever, which i devoutly check up on at least a couple of times a day, disgrasian. and i have to say that if disgrasian's posse ever hit the streets against malkin's, a la sharks versus jets in westside story, i know whose team i want to be on and do a snarling dance-off for: disgrasian.
jen and diane. seriously, they rock.
and while on the subject of favorite blogs, one blog that i repeatedly take great interest and joy in reading is actually the blog of former nba head coach eric musselman. his last nba gig was with my hometown team. he only lasted a season here, but he endured a lot of criticism because of how poorly that season went and his inability to truly get the respect of all of the players.
musselman posts at least several times a day, and of course, the theme of his blog centers around basketball, coaching, and other sports. there is just a really great tone about his posts. they are usually only a few paragraphs long, but they contain a wealth of really wise insights that pertain to stuff outside of sports, too. i just really take great pleasure in reading his writing -- and i always come away from his blog feeling just a bit more enlightened.
you know, i often end up feeling rather disembodied from people and from society in general. so it's great to just find other people in the world who are on the same wave-length as me and be able to connect with their ideas and perspectives.
like a bee to pollen . . . .
:-T
Monday, June 02, 2008
back on the chain gang
no, i haven't started studying yet.
my soul is crying out for "real life." i am yearning to be free, to start making a living, to willingly enslave myself to the desire for a sustainable living wage. my closet cries out for new pairs of designer jeans, marc jacobs heels, new designer bags, and this one really cute top from anthropologie. money, comfort, mental well-being -- these are the things that i love most.
but no, it's not meant to be . . . .
not yet anyhow.
for, tonight, it is done: i signed up for the july bar exam. . . .
and i feel like dr. faustus must have felt when he realized he had been tricked by mephistopheles that he had actually signed away his soul to eternal damnation, all for the sake of enjoying a few temporary earthly pleasures . . . .
*loong, drawn sigh*
what gets me is that i have signed my soul over like this to the california bar over and over again. it seemingly never ends.
but . . . i am starting to get in the mind-set for this shit all over again. waitress, j.d., had recommended that i use this book to help me with the MBEs for the last exam, and i wish i had followed her advice at the time. it's not that i blatantly disregarded her advice -- but i just couldn't afford even the fifty-plus dollar price-tage on the book at the time. . . . but of course, i can afford it now -- and i just placed an order for it a few days ago. hopefully, it gets here soon . . . .
and i also just signed up for a subscription to the bar essays website. i've taken a look through the website -- and i'm already impressed. it contains, among other things, a database full of both high-scoring and low-scoring essay exams that were actually written out, whether typed or hand-written, during bar exams of recent years, from between 2003 and 2007. it definitely seems like a good tool -- and i'll be printing out a bunch of materials for my review in the coming weeks.
overall, except for these additions to my studying repertoire, i am not really going to invest in other materials . . . . i know i have everything i need right here at my fingertips otherwise. it's real tempting to try to throw money around -- but it's not how much money you spend. it's what you do with the things you've got and make the most out of your resources. and i have a lot of shit available to me. i make great outlines. i just need to re-memorize the black letter and learn how to write the damned essays -- and just make sure to keep practicing this shit over and over and over again until i get it.
but this will be my last shot at the california bar. i'm moving on after this. whether to another state exam or just to another state altogether, i'm moving on and putting this behind me as soon as i get it over with. i'd like to make sure i make this last attempt worth my while. . . . but i'm not going to be too hung up on it if things don't go well yet again.
so much stuff to do and get done while i'm alive, you know? including writing a book. . . .
yes, i think i'd like to write a nice little novel . . . . about a crazy, weird, lezbo viet chick with a riotgrrl soul who went to law school to make her fam happy but whose dream is really just to be able to eat dim sum every day, blog about nothing, and be a kept girl in an ivory tower.
seriously, now -- what a great life that'd be. . . .
:-T
i am what i am.
i'm so beat!
i had my 10k race yesterday morning. i was up at 6 a.m. (blasphemy! it was sunday, generally my laziest day of the week, too!). last year, i ran this race with three other friends; this year, i did it alone.
my first solo race . . . .
but i wanted to do it. my friends are either too far out of town to run this race with me -- or if they're in town, they're not in good shape anymore. :-T i didn't bother asking the latter group. they are the ones who also had talked big about wanting to do the bay to breakers 12k with me, then ended up bailing at the last minute with really lame excuses. i hate excuse-making -- and i knew i'd hear even more lame excuses -- so i decided to forgo them altogether and do it on my own.
and it was really a nice time. the race is not as grand as bay to breakers -- only a few hundred people showed up to do it. but it was still a great time. the race started at 8:30 am and wound through a really nice park along the river. the morning weather was really pleasant, too. and i think i improved my time from last year, when i did the same race, by about ten minutes.
:-D
as for running, it's definitely getting much better. if i keep it up, then i'll probably reach physical peaks i've never reached before. and for me, this is huge. i, abbagirl, have never been a runner. i've been the type of person who has always shied away from long-distance running. oh, i played sports when i was younger, up through law school. tennis, soccer, a bit of basketball. but those sports required a different kind of focus. sure, you run a lot and at different tempos -- but there was a purpose to it all. you didn't run just for the sake of running, with only your own mind to keep you company. you ran to keep pace with an opponent -- to lunge at balls, to block a defender, to do a sliding tackle.
but with running, you only have your own self to keep you company. it's more of a solo journey, an autonomous challenge. to run, i often have to talk myself into it, and then continue to talk myself into going for as long as i physically can. so this is unchartered territory for me -- i'm used to wimping out on things when the going gets too tough.
but this time? nope -- i think i'll keep going. :)
it still has me fatigued this morning, though. and my legs have a few aches -- but nothing major. all in all, it was a really good run yesterday.
work was heinously busy last week. like, heinous. i ended up working through breaks, couldn't find five minutes to pee to save my life, and also missed lunch a couple of days there. but it was all in an effort to keep things flowing and to stick as closely to my schedule as possible.
friday was the worst. it was a full day of interviews for that one position in that other unit that i've been griping about. 10 interviews total for the day, and it was my role to meet people at the security desk to bring them upstairs, get them started on their timed writing exam, then bring them over to the interviewees for their interview.
it is not very hard work -- but definitely time-consuming and a bit draining. physical, too.
at the end of it all, though, the interviewers were quite enthused about the interview pool, and they already knew who they wanted to hire -- this younger, tall blond guy. he had had a really impressive presence, and he looked a bit more put-together and distinguished than everyone else. and yes, he was a bit good-looking as well, so i'm not realy surprised that he won over the two interviewers, who are older, matronly women.
he was the last interviewee for the day. and after i had walked him out and returned to the interviewing room, i asked the two interviewers what they had thought about the day. they both agreed that they liked richard, the last interviewee, the best.
"oh, i don't blame you," i told them. "and i would happen to agree. even just from meeting him, and not knowing anything else, i was visually impressed with him."
one of the interviewers started cackling, and as she did so, i realized, at the same time, the implication that they were reading from my statement.
"i didn't mean --! no, i meant --!" i stuttered. but that made it worst and the two ladies started laughing with glee.
i had only meant that the guy had been dressed to the tens -- in an impeccable navy blue suit and shiny black shoes! i didn't mean he was hot. but that's how they took it. i could've easily shut them up by saying that there was no way in hell i meant that he was hot because, even though he's blond and blonds are definitely my type, he's still a dude, and i'm not into dudes.
but i didn't go there. and now i know that this is a joke that will not die. abbagirl will forever-more be teased for seemingly being way into an interviewee.
:-T
no, as you can guess, i'm not out at work. and it's not because i'm ashamed of it. i just think it's no one's business but mine. it's kinda the same issue as my ethnicity. i get annoyed as fuck when people ask me, "what are you?" and you know they're not asking you about your zodiac sign. no, they're asking you about your ethnicity -- where "you come from." and even that's a misphrasing; they don't want to hear that you come from california or from sac-town, as i do. "no, where's your family from?"
and i just hate that question. it makes me feel like i have to justify who i am and summarize myself with a single word -- all in an effort to placate the person who asked me that, as if s/he can know who i am just by saying which region of the world my family comes from.
i refuse to be categorized like that. i refuse to have one aspect of myself dictate my worth in other people's eyes. azngrrl? queerness? each of these things are only a single aspect of who i am -- and they have nothing to do with the persona i exhibit publicly and professionally. the way i see it, most of the people i interact with, who are not otherwise close friends or family, only need to know what i show them. here at work, i (hope i) show people that i'm a good worker who takes instruction well and who will not be difficult to work with. i also bring a particular skill-set to the table, and it is a skill-set that my bosses are completely familiar with, since i expounded on my abilities as thoroughly as i could when i interviewed with them.
but all other extraneous information, "what i am," whether it is gay or straight, white or yellow, is not necessary for anyone to know or to be concerned about. it has no affect or bearing on my professional strengths and abilities -- and until or unless it does, i intend to just keep on truckin' the way i've been. i'm not like perez hilton, who seems to think that everyone who's gay should shout it out loud.
i don't shout. i'm just mostly a quiet talker. i am what i am. and you'll know what you need to know.
period.















